Ultra 7 265K vs VIA Nano QuadCore C4650

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated88
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.18
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data27.96
Architecture codenameCNR (2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2015 (9 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.33 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size46 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketVIA nanoBGA21851
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 125 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 has 594.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore C4650
Nano QuadCore C4650
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 81 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore C4650 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.