Xeon w7-3555 vs VIA C7-M C7-M-2000

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesC7-Mno data
Architecture codenameEstherSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,339

Detailed specifications

VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data75 MB
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt325 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 325 Watt

VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 has 1525% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Xeon w7-3555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA C7-M C7-M-2000
C7-M C7-M-2000
Intel Xeon w7-3555
Xeon w7-3555

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 or Xeon w7-3555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.