Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs VIA C7-M C7-M-2000
Primary details
Comparing VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and M4 Max (14 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | C7-M | Apple M4 |
| Architecture codename | Esther | no data |
| Release date | no data | 30 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 14 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 80 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 14 |
| Threads | 1 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 80 Watt |
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 has 300% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and M4 Max (14 cores). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 and Apple M4 Max (14 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
