Athlon MP 2000+ vs VIA C3-M C3-M-1200

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 and Athlon MP 2000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesC3-MAMD Athlon MP
Architecture codenameNehemiahK7 (2000−2004)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)27 August 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$319

Detailed specifications

VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 and Athlon MP 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate200 MHz266 MT/s
Multiplierno data12.5
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data85 mm2
Number of transistorsno data37 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 and Athlon MP 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt58.2 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 and Athlon MP 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 58 Watt

VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 has 222.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 and Athlon MP 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 2000+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 and Athlon MP 2000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA C3-M C3-M-1200
C3-M C3-M-1200
AMD Athlon MP 2000+
Athlon MP 2000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 or Athlon MP 2000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.