i9-12900TE vs V-Series V160
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 235 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 59.68 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 1 December 2010 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 24 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 30 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | no data | 215 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 December 2010 | 4 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
Threads | 1 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
V-Series V160 has 40% lower power consumption.
i9-12900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that V-Series V160 is a notebook processor while Core i9-12900TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V160 and Core i9-12900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.