FirePro A300 vs UHD Graphics 630
Primary details
Comparing UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel UHD Graphics | no data |
Architecture codename | Gen9.5 | Trinity (2012−2013) |
Release date | no data | 7 August 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | no data | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.35 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 192K |
L2 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,303 million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1866 |
Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | FirePro |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
UHD Graphics 630 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a notebook processor while FirePro A300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between UHD Graphics 630 and FirePro A300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.