EPYC 7232P vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Primary details

Comparing UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.94
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel UHD GraphicsAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data8.80
Architecture codenameGen9.5Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data16
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.35 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data31
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data4 MB
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

EPYC 7232P has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7232P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between UHD Graphics 630 and EPYC 7232P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
AMD EPYC 7232P
EPYC 7232P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 91 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 125 votes

Rate EPYC 7232P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about UHD Graphics 630 or EPYC 7232P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.