Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.55
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.56
+1.8%

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28352823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turion Ultrano data
Power efficiency1.430.57
Architecture codenameGriffin (2008−2009)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)September 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.1-1.125Vno data
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 0.56
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5200+, on the other hand, has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+.

Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 11 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 309 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 or Athlon 64 X2 5200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.