EPYC 9655P vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 32 Watt
0.47
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+21177%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 by a whopping 21177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Turion Ultrano data
Power efficiency1.3823.54
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Turin (2024)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 100.00
Recency 3 June 2008 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 400 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 has 1150% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 21176.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 178 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.