Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs Turion X2 RM-75

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-75
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
42.79
+10088%

Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by a whopping 10088% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking304057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Turionno data
Power efficiency1.1419.88
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)no data
Release date1 January 2009 (16 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4000 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
PowerNow+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion X2 RM-75 0.42
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 42.79
+10088%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion X2 RM-75 670
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
+10145%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 42.79
Recency 1 January 2009 1 April 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 205 Watt

Turion X2 RM-75 has 485.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y, on the other hand, has a 10088.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-75 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8352Y is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion X2 RM-75 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.