Xeon 3.6 vs Turion X2 RM-74

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-74 and Xeon 3.6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Turionno data
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Irwindale (2004)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-74 and Xeon 3.6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB16 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data169 mm2
Number of transistorsno data178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-74 and Xeon 3.6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1604
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Xeon 3.6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Xeon 3.6 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 135 Watt

Turion X2 RM-74 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion X2 RM-74 and Xeon 3.6. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Turion X2 RM-74 is a notebook processor while Xeon 3.6 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-74 and Xeon 3.6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74
Intel Xeon 3.6
Xeon 3.6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 31 vote

Rate Turion X2 RM-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 3.6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-74 or Xeon 3.6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.