Celeron J1800 vs Turion X2 RM-72
Aggregate performance score
Turion X2 RM-72 outperforms Celeron J1800 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2957 | 3050 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 1.19 | 3.40 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.41 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | - |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.44 | 0.36 |
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 1 November 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Turion X2 RM-72 has a 22.2% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
The Turion X2 RM-72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-72 and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
