Phenom II X2 B55 vs Turion X2 RM-70
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X2 B55 outperforms Turion X2 RM-70 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2941 | 2657 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.02 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.34 | 0.88 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Callisto (2009−2010) |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $48 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 258 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.44 | 0.74 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 1 October 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 80 Watt |
Turion X2 RM-70 has 158.1% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X2 B55, on the other hand, has a 68.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Phenom II X2 B55 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-70 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 RM-70 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X2 B55 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-70 and Phenom II X2 B55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
