Pentium T4400 vs Turion X2 RM-70
Aggregate performance score
Pentium T4400 outperforms Turion X2 RM-70 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 RM-70 and Pentium T4400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2941 | 2889 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.34 | 1.32 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | no data |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 RM-70 and Pentium T4400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 RM-70 and Pentium T4400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | S1 | PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Pentium T4400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion X2 RM-70 and Pentium T4400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Pentium T4400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.44 | 0.49 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 1 October 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Turion X2 RM-70 has 12.9% lower power consumption.
Pentium T4400, on the other hand, has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Pentium T4400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-70 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-70 and Pentium T4400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
