A6-9225 vs Turion II Ultra M620

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M620
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.51
A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+64.7%

A6-9225 outperforms Turion II Ultra M620 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Ultra M620 and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28632570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II UltraAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.385.30
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M620 and A6-9225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M620 and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinBGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M620 and A6-9225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 686 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Ultra M620 0.51
A6-9225 0.84
+64.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Ultra M620 814
A6-9225 1332
+63.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion II Ultra M620 297
+9.6%
A6-9225 271

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion II Ultra M620 550
+21.4%
A6-9225 453

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion II Ultra M620 31.3
A6-9225 26.28
+19.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 0.84
Recency 10 September 2009 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A6-9225 has a 64.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The A6-9225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M620 and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M620
Turion II Ultra M620
AMD A6-9225
A6-9225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 29 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2292 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Ultra M620 or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.