Xeon Platinum 8571N vs Turion II P520

Aggregate performance score

Turion II P520
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.52
Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
44.35
+8429%

Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Turion II P520 by a whopping 8429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking284250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Turion IIno data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,839

Detailed specifications

Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)52
Threads2104
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data300 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1 (S1g4)FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II P520 0.52
Xeon Platinum 8571N 44.35
+8429%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II P520 801
Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
+8437%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 44.35
Recency 12 May 2010 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 52
Threads 2 104
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 300 Watt

Turion II P520 has 1100% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8571N, on the other hand, has a 8428.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 2500% more physical cores and 5100% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II P520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II P520 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II P520 and Xeon Platinum 8571N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II P520
Turion II P520
Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate Turion II P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II P520 or Xeon Platinum 8571N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.