Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U vs Turion II P520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II P520
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.53
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.49
+1125%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U outperforms Turion II P520 by a whopping 1125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28581061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency1.9339.45
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)7 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1 (S1g4)FP6
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-4266
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II P520 0.53
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U 6.49
+1125%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II P520 812
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U 9925
+1122%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion II P520 289
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U 1301
+350%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion II P520 522
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U 3975
+661%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 6.49
Recency 12 May 2010 7 May 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U has a 1124.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II P520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II P520 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II P520
Turion II P520
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate Turion II P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 54 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II P520 or Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.