Ryzen 9 4900H vs Turion II Neo K685

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II NeoAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data25.35
Architecture codenameGeneva (2010)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date15 December 2010 (13 years ago)16 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Neo K685 684
Ryzen 9 4900H 19150
+2700%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II Neo K685 1424
Ryzen 9 4900H 5946
+318%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion II Neo K685 3083
Ryzen 9 4900H 40253
+1206%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion II Neo K685 42
Ryzen 9 4900H 3.19
+1217%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Turion II Neo K685 1
Ryzen 9 4900H 23
+2136%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2010 16 March 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Turion II Neo K685 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 4900H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 9 4900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Neo K685
Turion II Neo K685
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Turion II Neo K685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 239 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Neo K685 or Ryzen 9 4900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.