Ryzen 3 5400U vs Turion II Neo K685

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Neo K685
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.43
Ryzen 3 5400U
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.97
+1521%

Ryzen 3 5400U outperforms Turion II Neo K685 by a whopping 1521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29691014
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II NeoAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency2.7143.95
Architecture codenameGeneva (2010)Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date15 December 2010 (14 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Neo K685 0.43
Ryzen 3 5400U 6.97
+1521%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Neo K685 684
Ryzen 3 5400U 11068
+1518%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 6.97
Recency 15 December 2010 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm

Ryzen 3 5400U has a 1520.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 5400U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Neo K685 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Neo K685 and Ryzen 3 5400U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Neo K685
Turion II Neo K685
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U
Ryzen 3 5400U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Turion II Neo K685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 127 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5400U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Neo K685 or Ryzen 3 5400U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.