Pentium M 718 vs Turion II N530

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2834not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIPentium M
Power efficiency1.46no data
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Banias (2003)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache265 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE(1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion II N530 30.4
+357%
Pentium M 718 139

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Turion II N530 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 718, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II N530 and Pentium M 718, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II N530
Turion II N530
Intel Pentium M 718
Pentium M 718

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Turion II N530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium M 718 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II N530 or Pentium M 718, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.