A6-3420M vs Turion II N530

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II N530
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54
A6-3420M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
+50%

A6-3420M outperforms Turion II N530 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II N530 and A6-3420M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28392588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion IIAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.462.19
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II N530 and A6-3420M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache265 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II N530 and A6-3420M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II N530 and A6-3420M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE(1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.03DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II N530 and A6-3420M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II N530 and A6-3420M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II N530 0.54
A6-3420M 0.81
+50%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II N530 855
A6-3420M 1294
+51.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion II N530 2245
+34.2%
A6-3420M 1673

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion II N530 4335
A6-3420M 5399
+24.5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion II N530 2128
A6-3420M 2305
+8.3%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion II N530 30.4
A6-3420M 23.64
+28.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 0.81
Recency 12 May 2010 20 December 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

A6-3420M has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-3420M is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II N530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II N530 and A6-3420M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II N530
Turion II N530
AMD A6-3420M
A6-3420M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Turion II N530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 196 votes

Rate A6-3420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II N530 or A6-3420M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.