Pentium T4200 vs Turion II M520
Aggregate performance score
Turion II M520 outperforms Pentium T4200 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion II M520 and Pentium T4200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2827 | 2933 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Turion II | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.51 | 1.22 |
Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | no data |
Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion II M520 and Pentium T4200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II M520 and Pentium T4200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | PGA478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M520 and Pentium T4200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
PowerNow | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion II M520 and Pentium T4200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II M520 and Pentium T4200 are enumerated here.
VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.56 | 0.45 |
Recency | 10 September 2009 | 1 January 2009 |
Turion II M520 has a 24.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.
The Turion II M520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium T4200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II M520 and Pentium T4200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.