Phenom II X3 N870 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-60
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
Phenom II X3 N870
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+130%

Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-60 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29182420
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 643x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency1.242.87
Architecture codenameTrinidad/Tyler (2007)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)16 December 2010 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache256 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB1.5 MB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size147 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors154 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)35/31 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions90/65 nm, 1.07586x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 1.06
Recency 4 May 2007 16 December 2010
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm

Phenom II X3 N870 has a 130.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Phenom II X3 N870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
AMD Phenom II X3 N870
Phenom II X3 N870

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 105 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 33 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-60 or Phenom II X3 N870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.