Atom Z510 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Intel Atom
Architecture codenameTrinidad/Tyler (2007)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$20

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz400 MT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache256 KB56 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size147 mm224.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
Number of transistors154 Million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)35/31 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions90/65 nm, 1.075Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2007 2 April 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom Z510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Atom Z510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Intel Atom Z510
Atom Z510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 105 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Atom Z510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-60 or Atom Z510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.