A9-9425 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiencyno data10.90
Architecture codenameTrinidad/Tyler (2007)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die size147 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors154 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FT4
Power consumption (TDP)35/31 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions90/65 nm, 1.075MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 184
A9-9425 320
+73.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 346
A9-9425 482
+39.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1619
A9-9425 2686
+65.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 3130
A9-9425 4338
+38.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1457
A9-9425 2314
+58.8%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 39
A9-9425 25.83
+51%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2007 31 May 2016
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A9-9425 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 105 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1533 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-60 or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.