Celeron T3500 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-56
Aggregate performance score
Celeron T3500 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-56 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-56 and Celeron T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2997 | 2897 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.15 | 1.30 |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad / Tyler (2007) | no data |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 July 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-56 and Celeron T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90/65 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-56 and Celeron T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33/31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 0.48 |
| Recency | 4 May 2007 | 1 July 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-56 has 6.1% lower power consumption.
Celeron T3500, on the other hand, has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron T3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-56 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-56 and Celeron T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
