Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-53
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1003 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 43.77 |
| Architecture codename | Tyler (2007−2009) | Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3) (2021) |
| Release date | 13 April 2007 (17 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, Extended 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, PowerNow!, NX-Bit | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 April 2007 | 16 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U has an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-53 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
