Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-53 Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Turion 64 X2 TL-58
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core 2 Duo T5500 Core 2 Duo T5750 Core 2 Duo T5800 Core 2 Duo T7200 Core 2 Duo T7250 Core 2 Duo T7300 Core 2 Duo T7500 Core 2 Duo T7700 Pentium Dual Core T2370 Pentium Dual Core T2390 Pentium Dual Core T3200 Pentium Dual Core T3400

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-52
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.33
Core 2 Duo T7200
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 34 Watt
0.46
+39.4%

Core 2 Duo T7200 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-52 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Core 2 Duo T7200 Core 2 Duo T7200

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core 2 Duo T7200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31252977
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.011.29
Architecture codenameTrinidad (2006−2007)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date17 May 2006 (18 years ago)28 July 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$286

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core 2 Duo T7200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz667 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0375V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core 2 Duo T7200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPPGA478, PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt34 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core 2 Duo T7200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core 2 Duo T7200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core 2 Duo T7200 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 0.33
Core 2 Duo T7200 0.46
+39.4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 1205
Core 2 Duo T7200 1717
+42.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.33 0.46
Recency 17 May 2006 28 July 2006
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 34 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 has 9.7% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Duo T7200, on the other hand, has a 39.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Core 2 Duo T7200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Core 2 Duo T7200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
vs
Core 2 Duo T5300 Core 2 Duo T5300
Core 2 Duo T7200 Core 2 Duo T7200
vs
Core 2 Duo T6400 Core 2 Duo T6400
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Atom x7405C Atom x7405C
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Xeon W-11955M Xeon W 11955M
vs
Turion II Neo K665 Turion II Neo K665
i5-2547M Core i5 2547M
vs
Pentium Dual T2330 Pentium Dual Core T2330
Ryzen Embedded 8840U Ryzen Embedded 8840U
vs
Pentium U5600 Pentium U5600
Core 2 Duo T7600 Core 2 Duo T7600
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Core 2 Duo T5500 Core 2 Duo T5500
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Ryzen 7 7735HS Ryzen 7 7735HS
vs
Core 2 Duo SU7300 Core 2 Duo SU7300
Xeon Gold 6538N Xeon Gold 6538N
vs
Turion Neo X2 L625 Turion Neo X2 L625
Xeon E-2488 Xeon E 2488
vs
Pentium Dual SU4100 Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
vs
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 11 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 109 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core 2 Duo T7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.