Athlon 900 vs Turion 64 ML-40

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesTurion 64no data
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)6 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm180 nm
Die size125 mm2102 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors114 million22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754A
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 60 Watt

Turion 64 ML-40 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Turion 64 ML-40 is a notebook processor while Athlon 900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-40 and Athlon 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-40
Turion 64 ML-40
AMD Athlon 900
Athlon 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 ML-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-40 or Athlon 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.