EPYC 9565 vs Turion 64 MK-36

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesTurion 64no data
Architecture codenameRichmondTurin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,486

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads1144
Base clock speedno data3.15 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 72
Threads 1 144
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 400 Watt

Turion 64 MK-36 has 1190.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9565, on the other hand, has 7100% more physical cores and 14300% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Turion 64 MK-36 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9565 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MK-36 and EPYC 9565, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MK-36
Turion 64 MK-36
AMD EPYC 9565
EPYC 9565

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Turion 64 MK-36 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9565 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 MK-36 or EPYC 9565, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.