Celeron J1750 vs Sempron 3850

VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 3850
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.72
+94.6%
Celeron J1750
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37

Sempron 3850 outperforms Celeron J1750 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26813019
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.733.50
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$72

Detailed specifications

Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.41 GHz
L1 cache256 KB112 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Sempron 3850 0.72
+94.6%
Celeron J1750 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 3850 1150
+93.3%
Celeron J1750 595

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.37
Recency 9 April 2014 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

Sempron 3850 has a 94.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron J1750, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Sempron 3850 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1750 in performance tests.

Note that Sempron 3850 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3850 and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850
Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 3850 or Celeron J1750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.