Celeron 2.8 GHz vs Sempron 3850
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2677 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 2.74 | no data |
Architecture codename | Kabini (2013−2014) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
Release date | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | AM1 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 52.8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | no data |
Number of pipelines | 128 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 52 Watt |
Sempron 3850 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 108% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron 3850 is a desktop processor while Celeron 2.8 GHz is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3850 and Celeron 2.8 GHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.