3015e vs Sempron 3500+
Aggregate performance score
3015e outperforms Sempron 3500+ by a whopping 1040% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 3500+ and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3311 | 2042 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 0.23 | 26.97 |
| Architecture codename | Palermo (2001−2005) | Pollock (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | 1 October 2005 (19 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $167 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3500+ and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 103 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3500+ and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3500+ and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3500+ and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 1.71 |
| Recency | 1 October 2005 | 4 August 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 6 Watt |
3015e has a 1040% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.
The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3500+ in performance tests.
Note that Sempron 3500+ is a desktop processor while 3015e is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3500+ and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
