E-240 vs Sempron 2650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 2650 and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Sempron 2650 and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.45 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2650 and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2650 and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 2650 and E-240 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2650 and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3 Single-channel
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6310
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Sempron 2650 and E-240 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Sempron 2650 and E-240 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 2650 and E-240.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 2650 551
+183%
E-240 195

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Sempron 2650 168
+57%
E-240 107

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Sempron 2650 294
+165%
E-240 111

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 April 2014 4 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 18 Watt

Sempron 2650 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

E-240, on the other hand, has 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 2650 and E-240. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Sempron 2650 is a desktop processor while E-240 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2650 and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2650
Sempron 2650
AMD E-240
E-240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 19 votes

Rate Sempron 2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 2650 or E-240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.