EPYC 7702P vs Sempron 140

VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated63
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.29
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data18.86
Architecture codenameSargas (2009−2011)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date22 July 2009 (15 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$4,425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache128 KB (per core)4 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size117 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors234 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3TR4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 140 486
EPYC 7702P 63300
+12925%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Sempron 140 310
EPYC 7702P 888
+186%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Sempron 140 316
EPYC 7702P 15480
+4799%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2009 7 August 2019
Physical cores 1 64
Threads 1 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 200 Watt

Sempron 140 has 344.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7702P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Sempron 140 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7702P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 140 and EPYC 7702P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140
AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 231 vote

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 32 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 140 or EPYC 7702P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.