Xeon Gold 6548Y+ vs Ryzen Z1
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 646 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 74.59 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | May 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,726 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 60 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 137 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 83 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FP8 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 32 |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Ryzen Z1 has a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6548Y+, on the other hand, has 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Z1 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Z1 and Xeon Gold 6548Y+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
