EPYC 7532 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
2023
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
83.85
+152%
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
33.21

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX outperforms EPYC 7532 by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.75no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency22.6715.71
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,349no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size8x 71 mm2no data
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsTR5Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 83.85
+152%
EPYC 7532 33.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 133194
+152%
EPYC 7532 52755

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 83.85 33.21
Recency 19 October 2023 19 February 2020
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX has a 152.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7532 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and EPYC 7532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 35 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX or EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.