Athlon 1300 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 4 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.71 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 22.68 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Thunderbird B (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 21 March 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,349 | $318 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 8x 71 mm2 | 120 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | 37 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sTR5 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 68 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 21 March 2001 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 68 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX has an age advantage of 22 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 1300, on the other hand, has 414.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 1300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
