EPYC 7261 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 16 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 14 June 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 4x 71 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 26,280 million | 19200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | sTR5 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 155 W, 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 170.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 14 June 2018 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 8 |
| Threads | 64 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 155 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC 7261, on the other hand, has 125.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 7261, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
