A6-4400M vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
60.25
+9314%
A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX outperforms A6-4400M by a whopping 9314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking162763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.42no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency16.291.73
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,899no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads642
Base clock speed4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die size4x 71 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors26,280 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5unknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 7520G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 60.25
+9314%
A6-4400M 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95712
+9376%
A6-4400M 1010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.25 0.64
Recency 19 October 2023 15 May 2012
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has a 9314.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

A6-4400M, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is a server/workstation processor while A6-4400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and A6-4400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 187 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX or A6-4400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.