A9-9425 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 350 Watt
50.94
+2845%
A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.73

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 2845% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking332031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.84no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency13.7710.91
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,649no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed4.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm28 nm
Die size4x 71 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5FT4
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 50.94
+2845%
A9-9425 1.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 80920
+5252%
A9-9425 1512

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.94 1.73
Recency 19 October 2023 31 May 2016
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has a 2844.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9425, on the other hand, has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is a server/workstation processor while A9-9425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1534 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.