Turion 64 MT-28 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms Turion 64 MT-28 by a whopping 32494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 19 | 3256 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Turion 64 |
Power efficiency | 19.83 | 0.68 |
Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
Release date | 8 March 2022 (2 years ago) | June 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 128 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
Multiplier | 27 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 256 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 114 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | WRX8 | 754 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 58.67 | 0.18 |
Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
Threads | 128 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a 32494.4% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 MT-28, on the other hand, has 1020% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-28 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a server/workstation processor while Turion 64 MT-28 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Turion 64 MT-28, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.