Xeon Gold 6448Y vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
49.43
+25.1%
Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
39.50

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Xeon Gold 6448Y by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3977
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.56
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency16.1016.01
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,583

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache2 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB60 MB
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C79 °C
Number of transistors16,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketWRX8FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y.

PCIe version4.05
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 49.43
+25.1%
Xeon Gold 6448Y 39.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75654
+25.2%
Xeon Gold 6448Y 60449

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.43 39.50
Recency 8 March 2022 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has a 25.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Gold 6448Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6448Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6448Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y
Xeon Gold 6448Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6448Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX or Xeon Gold 6448Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.