Itanium 9140M vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 132 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
Power efficiency | 10.66 | no data |
Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | no data |
Release date | 8 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | no data |
Threads | 32 | no data |
Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | no data |
Multiplier | 40 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 64 MB | 18 MB L3 Cache |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | WRX8 | PPGA611 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 8 March 2022 | 1 October 2007 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 104 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
Itanium 9140M, on the other hand, has 169.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Itanium 9140M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.