Mobile Sempron 200U vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 192 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 8.64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Huron (2009) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (2 years ago) | 16 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1600 MHz |
| Multiplier | 41 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | WRX8 | ASB1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AMD64, SSE1-3, MMX |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 March 2022 | 16 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 8 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX has an age advantage of 13 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron 200U, on the other hand, has 3400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is a server/workstation processor while Mobile Sempron 200U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and Mobile Sempron 200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
