EPYC 9255 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking68not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency13.29no data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date14 July 2020 (4 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,495

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6448
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm4 nm
Die size74 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketsWRX8SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 July 2020 10 October 2024
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

EPYC 9255, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
AMD EPYC 9255
EPYC 9255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 88 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or EPYC 9255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.