Ultra 7 268V vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
39.41
+161%
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.09

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core Ultra 7 268V by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking67461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency13.3284.00
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date14 July 2020 (4 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm3 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsWRX8Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1284

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 39.41
+161%
Ultra 7 268V 15.09

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 28798
+195%
Ultra 7 268V 9766

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.41 15.09
Recency 14 July 2020 24 September 2024
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 17 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has a 161.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1547.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 268V in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 268V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 88 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.