Xeon E5-2675 V3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
50.29
+506%
Xeon E5-2675 V3
2014
16 cores / 32 threads, 110 Watt
8.30

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Xeon E5-2675 V3 by a whopping 506% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34904
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.21no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency17.007.14
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date7 February 2020 (4 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB40 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm22 nm
Die size74 mm2356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C83 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketTR42011-3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 50.29
+506%
Xeon E5-2675 V3 8.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 79889
+506%
Xeon E5-2675 V3 13180

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.29 8.30
Recency 7 February 2020 8 September 2014
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 110 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has a 505.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2675 V3, on the other hand, has 154.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2675 V3 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2675 V3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3990X and Xeon E5-2675 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Intel Xeon E5-2675 V3
Xeon E5-2675 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1118 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2675 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3990X or Xeon E5-2675 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.