Xeon Silver 4114T vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 64 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 16.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Xeon Silver |
| Power efficiency | 13.43 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 25 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 37 | 22 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 640 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 10 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 13.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 92 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | TR4 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | 115.212 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 November 2019 | 11 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 10 |
| Threads | 64 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 85 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an age advantage of 2 years, 220% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon Silver 4114T, on the other hand, has 229.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4114T is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Silver 4114T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
