Processor N200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 2448% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 65 | 2107 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.62 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 13.44 | 24.61 |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 25 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | $193 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 39.75 | 1.56 |
| Recency | 25 November 2019 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has a 2448.1% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 4566.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
